Texas Senate Bill SCR16

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Granting the legislature permission to adjourn for more than three days during the period beginning on Wednesday, February 13, 2019, and ending on Tuesday, February 19, 2019.

Impact

This resolution is particularly significant within the context of the Texas Constitution, which ordinarily restricts the legislature from adjourning for any more than three days without mutual consent between the two houses. By passing SCR16, the legislature effectively establishes a precedent that allows for more flexibility in managing their session schedules. This action is expected to enhance the legislative process by providing legislators with the necessary time to deliberate on various pending matters without the usual constraints of a strict calendar.

Summary

SCR16, or Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 16, was introduced during the 86th Legislature of the State of Texas and aims to modify the standard rules regarding legislative adjournment. Specifically, it seeks to grant each house of the legislature the permission to adjourn for more than three days, during the period from February 13, 2019, to February 19, 2019. This period of extended adjournment allows legislators to take a break, presumably for logistical reasons or to facilitate further discussions and preparations for the ongoing legislative session.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR16 appears to be generally positive, with legislators from both the Senate and the House voting unanimously in favor of the resolution. The adoption of SCR16 reflects a collaborative spirit between the two chambers, indicating that when it comes to matters of procedural significance, there is a shared understanding of the need for flexibility. This resolution was adopted with a vote of 31-0 in the Senate and 140-0 in the House, showcasing bipartisan support.

Contention

Notable points of contention are absent in the context of SCR16 as it did not provoke significant debate or opposition. Instead, the resolution passed smoothly without dissent, suggesting a clear consensus among legislators regarding the necessity of the adjournment. However, it raises awareness of the legislative process and could be indicative of future discussions regarding the rules governing legislative sessions and adjournments.