Louisiana House Bill HB632

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10
• Report Pass: 4/14/10
• Engrossed: 4/21/10
• Report Pass: 6/9/10

Caption

Provides relative to reports required to be submitted to the legislature (EG DECREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 632 is expected to simplify and centralize the reporting process within state government. It will require agencies to send a list of their reports and publications electronically to the David R. Poynter Legislative Research Library, which will then distribute this information to lawmakers. The new system aims to promote governmental efficiency by ensuring timely dissemination of information to legislators while potentially reducing the overall volume of printed material, which aligns well with ongoing efforts to enhance government transparency.

Summary

House Bill 632 aims to streamline the process for state agencies when submitting required reports to the legislature. Specifically, the bill mandates that each agency provide only one printed copy of their report to the presiding officer of each house. Additionally, agencies are permitted to send electronic copies of reports to one or more members of the legislature, enhancing digital accessibility. This legislative initiative is part of a broader effort to modernize governmental communication and reduce unnecessary paper usage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 632 is largely supportive, particularly among those advocating for increased efficiency in state operations and enhanced legislative oversight. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate better access to agency reports for lawmakers, allowing more informed decision-making. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential for reduced scrutiny of reports since fewer printed copies may limit accessibility for those who prefer physical documents over electronic formats.

Contention

While HB 632 has generally been well-received, there exists a notion of contention regarding the shift to electronic distribution. Critics are concerned that reliance on digital means could disenfranchise lawmakers or constituents who may not have reliable internet access or may prefer traditional formats for reviewing detailed reports. Despite these reservations, the prevailing view supports the idea that improving access and efficiency outweighs the potential drawbacks related to electronic communication.