Requires the commissioner of administration and the Board of Regents to establish and implement an agency attrition analysis process. (8/15/10) (EN DECREASE GF EX See Note)
Impact
The implementation of this bill will have significant implications for state laws governing workforce management in executive agencies and higher education systems. By systematically reviewing staffing needs and vacancy rates, agencies will be compelled to justify the retention of unfilled positions and strategize on personnel management. The goal is tight budget control and resource allocation, aligning with broader initiatives to streamline government expenditures and potentially reduce the state general fund's costs associated with personnel.
Summary
Senate Bill 293 mandates that the Commissioner of Administration and the Board of Regents establish an agency attrition analysis process. This process aims to evaluate historical position vacancies and enforce a reduction of authorized positions in the executive branch of state government by five percent annually for three consecutive years. The intent is to streamline state government operations by addressing vacancies in budget units, programs, and subprograms, thereby improving overall efficiency of the administrative processes.
Sentiment
The sentiments surrounding SB293 appear to be largely positive among supporters who advocate for efficiency in state government. Proponents argue that the implementation of an attrition analysis process would enhance transparency and accountability in managing state resources. However, there may also be underlying concerns regarding potential job losses and the impacts on the functioning of various agencies, suggesting that some stakeholders may view the bill with caution or opposition, particularly those fearing that it could undermine the workforce in essential public services.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding the bill could arise from the communities affected by the diminishing number of positions, as they may argue that the reductions should not sacrifice public service quality. Additionally, discussions may emerge on how the measures will affect existing employees, workloads, and agency capabilities, particularly when faced with increased demands. Stakeholders from various sectors, including higher education and public administration, may contest the implications of these staffing reductions and their broader effects on service delivery.
Provides for development and implementation by state agencies of policies, training, and reporting relative to compliance with requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (EN SEE FISC NOTE OF EX See Note)
Directs each state executive agency to reduce the costs of its contracts by ten percent for FY11, except as approved by the commissioner of administration. (7/1/10) (OR -$46,900,000 GF EX See Note)
Provides that a website established and maintained by the commissioner of administration shall be the official journal of the state and requires him to post certain information about boards and commissions on it (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
Requires itemized monthly spending reports to be maintained on a website established and maintained by the commissioner of administration (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Directs the development of a plan to support state employees who are terminated due to implementation of budget-reduction measures in preparation for reentry to the private sector workforce. (EG NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)