Directs each state executive agency to reduce the costs of its contracts by ten percent for FY11, except as approved by the commissioner of administration. (7/1/10) (OR -$46,900,000 GF EX See Note)
Impact
The implementation of SB 288 is expected to significantly impact the way state agencies operate in terms of budgeting and financial management. By imposing a uniform cost-cutting measure, the bill aims to encourage agencies to reassess their contractual obligations and seek out more cost-effective solutions. A reporting mechanism is also established, requiring agencies to report their contract reductions and any exceptions granted to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget, thereby increasing accountability in budget management.
Summary
Senate Bill 288, drafted by Senator Donahue, mandates a 10% reduction in contract costs for all state executive agencies for the fiscal year 2010-2011. This directive is aimed at streamlining government operations and ensuring fiscal responsibility amidst budget constraints. The bill intends to force agencies to identify areas for cost savings, thereby contributing to the overall reduction of state expenditures.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 288 appears to be generally supportive among those advocating for fiscal responsibility and efficiency within government agencies. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential impact on service delivery, as agencies adjust their contracts, which could lead to reduced service levels in some areas. This highlights a balancing act between cost savings and the necessity of maintaining quality operations.
Contention
While the bill is framed as a responsible fiscal measure, there are points of contention regarding the exceptions clause, which allows the commissioner of administration to approve deviations from the 10% reduction requirement. Critics may view this as a potential loophole that could undermine the bill's cost-cutting goals, allowing agencies with strong arguments to preserve funding at the expense of broader fiscal discipline. The effectiveness of this measure will depend on the transparency of the exception process and the willingness of agencies to prioritize cost savings.
Requires the commissioner of administration and the Board of Regents to establish and implement an agency attrition analysis process. (8/15/10) (EN DECREASE GF EX See Note)
Requires state and local contractors to disclose the full disposition, splitting, or sharing of contract commissions, fees, or other consideration by an "affidavit of notice of fee disposition" if the contract is let without bid. (7/1/10) (RE SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
Requires all state boards and commissions in the executive branch to file annually with the commissioner of administration, the speaker of the House, and the president of the Senate, a financial statement, and requires that all revenues received by such board or commission that are surplus be subject to appropriation for any lawful purpose. (8/15/10)
Requires certain contracting entities to submit information to the commissioner of administration prior to contracting with a state agency or receiving monies (OR +$60,000 GF EX See Note)
Provides for the state to contract with a private entity to develop and implement a safety plan to reduce the reportable incident rate of state employees, including accountability for accomplishing such goals. (8/15/10) (OR NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)