Connecticut Senate Bill SB00964

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/11
• Refer: 2/16/11
• Report Pass: 3/30/11
• Refer: 4/11/11
• Report Pass: 4/18/11
• Refer: 4/27/11
• Report Pass: 5/3/11
• Engrossed: 5/31/11
• Report Pass: 6/1/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Civil Liability Of Parents Or Guardians Of Children Who Cause Personal Injury Or Property Damage.

Impact

The proposed legislation is designed to create a stronger accountability mechanism for parents or guardians regarding their children's conduct. By imposing liability, the bill aims to encourage greater responsibility among guardians, potentially leading to a decrease in juvenile delinquency and associated damages. The addition of financial liability may compel guardians to supervise their minors more effectively and instill a sense of accountability for the behavior of their children.

Summary

SB00964 addresses the civil liability of parents or guardians when their unemancipated minor children cause personal injury or property damage. Under this act, parents and guardians are held jointly responsible alongside their children for damages caused by willful or malicious actions, up to a value of ten thousand dollars. This change increases the previous limit from five thousand dollars, thus expanding the financial implications for guardians who may have responsibility for their children's actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00964 is largely supportive among lawmakers who view it as a necessary step for enhancing civil responsibility. Proponents argue that the bill strikes a balance between holding caregivers accountable while not relieving minors of their responsibilities. However, there may also be concern expressed by some guardians who feel that this legislation imposes an unfair burden on families, particularly those with children who may make impulsive decisions without parental influence or knowledge.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the limits of parental responsibility and the implications of increased liability. Critics might argue that it is unjust to place financial responsibility on parents for actions beyond their control or knowledge. Moreover, there is ongoing debate about whether such measures effectively address the root causes of juvenile misbehavior or if they instead serve to penalize those who might already be struggling to manage challenging parenting situations.