Louisiana House Bill HCR183

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/20/10
• Refer: 5/24/10

Caption

Directs the disaster recovery unit of the office of community development in the division of administration to provide funding for certain projects in Terrebonne Parish in FY 2010-2011

Impact

The bill aims to address infrastructural needs in Terrebonne Parish, which might have been underscored by previous disasters, highlighting the necessity for elevated access to reduce flood risks and improve overall resilience against natural disasters. Allocating these funds is expected to enhance community safety and ensure the effectiveness of water management systems in the area, ultimately benefiting the residents through improved access and emergency responsiveness.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 183 directs the disaster recovery unit of the office of community development within the division of administration to allocate specific funding to the Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government. This funding is earmarked for projects necessary for the enhancement of infrastructure within the parish during the fiscal year 2010-2011. The resolution outlines precise amounts to be allocated for three key projects: the elevation of Boudreaux Canal access road, the elevation of the pump state access road to D-19 in Lower Dularge, and the installation of a Sheet Pile at the Oleander pump station.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR183 appears to be supportive, especially among local stakeholders who recognize the imperative need for funding in light of past challenges. Community members and local officials expressed appreciation for the legislative acknowledgment of their infrastructure concerns. However, sentiments may vary with respect to how quickly these projects can be funded and executed given potential bureaucratic delays inherent in government projects.

Contention

While the resolution seems to garner local support, potential contention could arise regarding the allocation process and accountability for the funds. Concerns may surface about whether the funding will be utilized effectively and if it will adequately meet the specific needs of the community. There might also be a backdrop of skepticism regarding the speed of implementation and whether the proposed solutions will bring substantial and timely improvements to the community's infrastructure.