Louisiana House Bill HB412

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/26/11

Caption

Creates the Louisiana Beverage Container Law (OR INCREASE SD RV See Note)

Impact

The law is designed to create a structured recycling program that not only encourages the return of used containers but also relieves some pressure on municipal waste systems by promoting the proper disposal of beverage containers. By requiring businesses involved in the distribution of beverages to participate in the refund and collection process, the bill seeks to increase the rates of container recycling significantly across the state. The funds from unredeemed deposits will be allocated to the Environmental Trust Fund, which will help finance various recycling and environmental programs.

Summary

House Bill 412 proposes the Louisiana Beverage Container Law, which establishes a framework for collecting deposits on glass and metal beverage containers sold within the state. The law mandates that every beverage container must have a minimum refund value of 5¢ and require manufacturers, distributors, and dealers to clearly mark the refund value on the containers. This initiative aims to incentivize recycling and reduces litter which can be harmful to public safety and the environment. The introduction of this system reflects a growing concern regarding litter from discarded beverage containers and seeks to promote environmentally responsible behavior in consumers and businesses alike.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 412 is generally supportive among environmental advocacy groups and certain lawmakers who view it as a proactive measure to combat litter and promote recycling. On the other hand, some concerns have emerged regarding the potential impact on businesses involved in beverage sales, particularly the logistics of implementing this deposit and redemption system. Critics express worries that the additional cost burden could be passed on to consumers, causing higher prices for beverages.

Contention

During discussions, notable points of contention include how the bill will affect smaller businesses and whether the infrastructure for such a redemption system is adequately prepared to handle the additional workload. Stakeholders have raised concerns about the operational challenges that may arise from the mandatory acceptance of returned containers and how penalties for non-compliance will be enforced. The balance between environmental benefits and economic impacts remains a key focus of the debate surrounding the bill.