Louisiana House Bill HB236

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Judy Stanford v. State of Louisiana DOTD"

Impact

The passing of this bill enforces the state’s commitment to resolving legal matters promptly and ensures that funds are allocated to fulfill court judgments. By appropriating funds for this purpose, the legislation reinforces the importance of upholding judicial decisions and maintaining accountability within state operations. Such appropriations are significant not only for the parties involved but also for the public perception of state governance and justice.

Summary

House Bill 236 focuses on the appropriation of state funds to address a specific legal matter involving a consent judgment in the case of 'Judy Stanford v. State of Louisiana DOTD'. The bill outlines the direct allocation of $10,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2011-2012 intended for the settlement of this particular lawsuit. This act illustrates the ongoing legal and financial responsibilities that the state faces in settling disputes, specifically those connected to actions taken or decisions made by state departments.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding HB 236 is procedural and focused on financial accountability rather than contentious ideological debates. It reflects a pragmatic approach to governance, where financial allocations are seen as necessary responses to legal obligations. There may have been minimal pushback since the bill is aimed at fulfilling an existing judgment, thus illustrating a consensus on the importance of adhering to judicial mandates.

Contention

While the bill primarily serves to appropriate funds rather straightforwardly, it brings attention to the financial implications of ongoing legal disputes involving the state. It does not appear to spark significant contention in legislative discussions as its purpose is to manage a specific financial obligation rather than introduce new policies or amendments to existing laws. This is indicative of the kind of legislative actions that governments must undertake regularly to ensure compliance with judicial outcomes.