Louisiana House Bill HB281

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/25/11
• Report Pass: 5/10/11
• Engrossed: 5/16/11
• Refer: 5/17/11
• Report Pass: 6/6/11
• Enrolled: 6/20/11
• Chaptered: 6/27/11
• Passed: 6/27/11

Caption

Requires the assessor in certain parishes to pay insurance premiums for retirees (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

Impact

The implementation of HB 281 will primarily affect assessors in various parishes across Louisiana, particularly those with populations between 10,000 and 11,000. By requiring local assessors to pay these insurance premiums, the bill is expected to enhance the financial security of retirees within this sector, ultimately supporting their health and well-being during retirement. While this act establishes uniformity in premium payments among assessors, it also reflects a growing recognition of the need to provide more comprehensive support for public sector retirees.

Summary

House Bill 281 is legislation that modifies existing Louisiana law regarding the payment of insurance premiums for certain retirees from the office of the assessor. Specifically, the bill mandates that assessors in selected parishes must cover the premiums for group life, health, dental, and other forms of medical insurance for retirees who meet certain service and age requirements. This legislation aims to ensure that qualified retirees receive adequate health coverage after their years of service, addressing a significant concern for local government employees who retire with lengthy service records.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 281 seems to be largely supportive among legislators who recognize the importance of protecting the health benefits of retirees. Advocates argue that providing insurance support is a moral imperative that acknowledges the contributions of public employees. However, there could be concerns raised about the financial implications for local governments and assessors, especially regarding budget allocations and the sustainable management of funds needed to cover these additional costs.

Contention

There are notable points of contention regarding the potential financial burden that this bill may impose on specific parishes. Opponents might raise concerns about the viability of enforcing such a mandate, particularly in smaller parishes that may struggle with budget constraints. Additionally, discussions about equity could emerge, questioning whether similar provisions should be extended to other governmental officials or sectors. The balance between providing necessary support for retirees and maintaining fair fiscal policies within local governments will likely continue to be debated.