Texas Senate Bill SCR2

Texas 2023 - 88th 3rd C.S.

Caption

Declaring an invasion of the State of Texas by transnational cartel terrorists, urging the governor to accelerate the construction of a wall along the Southern Border, and demanding that Congress deploy military forces to combat transnational cartels.

Impact

If passed, SCR2 would invoke the state’s right to protect itself against invasions under both the U.S. and Texas constitutions. This could result in significant changes to how Texas manages its border security and emergency response to criminal activities. By formally declaring an invasion, the state could mobilize resources more rapidly and assert greater control in its defense strategies. The resolution also seeks to appropriate funds for ongoing state border initiatives, thus impacting future budgeting and prioritization of law enforcement resources in Texas.

Summary

SCR2, introduced by Senator Creighton, is a concurrent resolution that declares an invasion of the State of Texas by transnational cartel terrorists. The resolution emphasizes the severe impacts of criminal enterprises exploiting weak points along the United States Southern Border, which has led to substantial security threats, drug trafficking, and violence affecting both residents of Texas and the broader United States. SCR2 urges the Texas Governor to hasten the construction of a border wall and calls on Congress to deploy military forces to combat these cartels while demanding increased federal support for state border security efforts.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding SCR2 is likely to be supportive among conservative lawmakers and constituents concerned about border security, crime, and the influence of transnational cartels. Proponents view the resolution as a necessary step towards safeguarding Texan lives and reducing crime linked to drug trafficking organizations. Conversely, critics may argue that framing the problem as an 'invasion' could lead to unnecessary militarization of border security and potentially violate civil rights or escalate tensions in border communities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SCR2 include the implications of escalating military presence along the border and the effectiveness of constructing physical barriers like a wall. While proponents argue that such measures are essential to deter cartel activities and protect citizens, opponents raise concerns about the humanitarian impact and whether these strategies will genuinely curb drug trafficking and violence. Additionally, concerns about local autonomy and the long-term consequences of federal military involvement in state affairs may further fuel debate about the resolution's merits.