Connecticut Senate Bill SB00455

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/21/12
• Refer: 3/21/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Refer: 4/13/12
• Report Pass: 4/19/12
• Refer: 4/25/12

Caption

An Act Concerning The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities.

Impact

If enacted, SB00455 will require state agencies to set aside a portion of their contracts for small contractors and minority business enterprises. This includes a requirement that a minimum of 25% of contracts in specified categories must be awarded to such businesses. Additionally, the bill stipulates the creation of an affirmative action plan that contractors must submit for approval before being awarded contracts, and compliance will be monitored by the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities.

Summary

SB00455, titled 'An Act Concerning the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities', seeks to amend existing laws related to the awarding of state contracts with a focus on minority business enterprises. The bill establishes a review committee specifically tasked with overseeing the compliance of state agencies with provisions regarding contract awards and set-asides designed to benefit minority-owned businesses. The intent is to ensure equitable opportunities in state contracting processes, thus addressing historical disadvantages experienced by these enterprises.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00455 appears to reflect a commitment to enhancing diversity in state contracting, with supporters emphasizing the need for equitable treatment and opportunities for minority businesses. However, some concerns arise regarding the administrative burden these changes may impose on state agencies and contractors, suggesting a split opinion on the feasibility of implementation, especially among those who prioritize economic efficiency.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between enforcing affirmative action requirements and ensuring that all contractors—even those not qualifying as minority-owned—are afforded fair opportunities in state contracting. There is also debate about how strictly the bill would be enforced and whether it adequately addresses the dynamics of competition among contractors. Critics argue that the specific focus on set-asides could inadvertently limit opportunities for capable contractors simply due to their ownership status.