Louisiana House Bill HR57

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/1/11
• Passed: 6/2/11

Caption

Recognizes Thursday, June 2, 2011, as March of Dimes Day at the La. State Capitol

Impact

The resolution serves as a platform to bring attention to the alarming statistics regarding preterm births in Louisiana, which have resulted in the state receiving an 'F' grade for its birth outcomes. By recognizing March of Dimes Day, the resolution seeks to spur legislative action to address the high preterm birth rates, which are a pressing concern for public health officials. This acknowledgment will likely influence both awareness and funding for initiatives aimed at improving maternal and infant health.

Summary

House Resolution 57 recognizes June 2, 2011, as March of Dimes Day at the Louisiana State Capitol. This resolution aims to honor the efforts of the March of Dimes organization in raising awareness about the critical public health issue of preterm birth, advocating for policies that can potentially improve birth outcomes. The resolution highlights the long history of March of Dimes in combating polio and its ongoing commitment to prevent preterm birth which significantly affects newborn health and mortality rates within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR57 is largely positive, promoting a collaborative effort between the state and non-profit organizations like the March of Dimes. Legislators who support this resolution view it as an essential commitment to supporting families facing the challenges of infant care. The recognition of such a dedicated advocacy day underlines a collective intent to improve health outcomes for the vulnerable population of newborns in Louisiana.

Contention

While there is overall support for the resolution, the discussion may also reflect broader conversations around healthcare policies and the allocation of resources to address preterm birth effectively. Any opposition can stem from potential disagreements regarding how best to implement supportive programs or debates over funding priorities within the state’s health budget. However, the resolution itself does not indicate significant points of contention, focusing instead on unity in promoting public health initiatives.