Louisiana House Bill HR83

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/7/12
• Passed: 5/8/12

Caption

Recognizes Tuesday, May 8, 2012, as March of Dimes Day at the La. State Capitol

Impact

The resolution serves to formally acknowledge the March of Dimes and its significance in the fight against preterm births. By designating a specific day for awareness, it encourages public engagement and support for initiatives that address infant health issues. The recognition may also promote collaboration between government entities and the March of Dimes to further legislative efforts aimed at improving maternal and infant care in Louisiana, potentially influencing state health policies.

Summary

House Resolution 83 recognizes Tuesday, May 8, 2012, as March of Dimes Day at the Louisiana State Capitol. The resolution aims to highlight the efforts of the March of Dimes, an organization that has played a significant role in public health, particularly in addressing preterm births. It emphasizes the importance of their work in funding research to identify underlying causes and advocating for improved care quality for newborns. The resolution acknowledges the alarming statistics surrounding preterm birth and aims to raise awareness among Louisiana citizens regarding this critical issue.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HR83 is positive, reflecting a sense of community support for a cause that affects many families. Lawmakers appear unified in recognizing the importance of addressing preterm births and promoting better health outcomes for newborns. The resolution fosters optimism around the potential for increased public awareness and legislative backing for health initiatives that could improve care for vulnerable infants.

Contention

Although HR83 is primarily a resolution of recognition and support, it does indirectly highlight issues of public concern regarding healthcare access and quality for newborns in Louisiana. It calls attention to the state's high rates of preterm births and the need for increased efforts in both research and community programs. While there may not be explicit contention surrounding this resolution, it underscores a broader debate regarding resource allocation for public health initiatives in the state.