Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB232

Introduced
3/12/12  

Caption

Provides for the liberative prescriptive period applicable to open accounts

Impact

The proposed increase in the prescriptive period could significantly impact state laws pertaining to debt collection and legal actions regarding commercial transactions. By lengthening the time during which creditors can initiate legal action for unpaid debts, the bill may provide those in business sectors a better opportunity to recover funds owed to them. However, this also raises potential concerns for consumers who might be subject to claims for a longer duration, increasing their exposure to legal actions related to outstanding debts.

Summary

House Bill 232 seeks to amend the Louisiana Civil Code by extending the liberative prescriptive period for actions concerning open accounts. Currently, the law stipulates a three-year prescriptive period for such actions, and this bill proposes increasing that period to five years. This change aims to provide creditors with a longer timeframe to pursue payment for debts that are considered open accounts, which includes various services and commodities provided but not yet compensated.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 232 appears to be mixed among lawmakers and stakeholders. Proponents of the bill argue that extending the prescriptive period will facilitate fairer practices in debt recovery, offering businesses necessary protections against delinquent payments. In contrast, some opponents express concern that increasing the time allowed for creditors to file claims could lead to increased pressure on consumers, prolonging financial stress and complicating their ability to manage debts effectively.

Contention

Notably, the discussions surrounding HB 232 may reflect broader tensions between the interests of creditors and consumer protection advocates. Critics suggest that the extended prescriptive period might disproportionately benefit businesses at the expense of individuals struggling with financial difficulties. Proponents, however, counter that the adjustment is a necessary measure to ensure that businesses can operate effectively without the burden of insufficient timeframes for claim resolution.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB492

Provides for the liberative prescriptive period applicable to certain actions

LA HSR2

Requests the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to study the liberative prescriptive period applicable to certain actions

LA HB282

Provides for a liberative prescriptive period of two years

LA SB168

Provides for liberative prescription on mineral leases on state property. (8/1/25)

LA HB588

Provides relative to extending liberative prescriptive periods

LA HB258

Provides for the liberative prescription on actions to recover underpayments or overpayments of royalties from the production of minerals

LA HB552

Provides relative to liberative prescription

LA HB556

Provides a three-year liberative prescriptive period for actions arising from cases of rape

LA HB720

Provides relative to liberative prescription

LA HB434

Provides for the suspension of liberative prescription in class action suits

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB149

Controlled substances: prescriptions.

TX SB594

Relating to the regulation of prescriptions for controlled substances, including certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2246

Relating to certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.