Louisiana House Bill HB402

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Engrossed: 4/10/12
• Refer: 4/11/12
• Report Pass: 5/8/12
• Enrolled: 5/23/12
• Chaptered: 6/1/12
• Passed: 6/1/12

Caption

Relative to the 21st Judicial District Court's Judicial Expense Fund

Impact

The implications of this bill are significant for the management and funding of judicial functions within the Two Districts. By restricting the allocation of funds, the bill seeks to maintain fiscal responsibility and prevent financial overreach into overlapping jurisdictions. This means that any personnel or judges from the Twenty-Second District will not be financially supported by funds meant for the Twenty-First District, reducing the potential for budgetary conflicts between these districts.

Summary

House Bill 402 pertains specifically to the judicial expense fund of the Twenty-First Judicial District Court in Louisiana. The bill aims to amend existing laws to prohibit the use of the judicial expense fund to pay salaries for judges and personnel from the Twenty-Second Judicial District. This legislative change is intended to ensure that funds allocated for judicial operations are not diverted to support personnel or expenses outside of the Twenty-First Judicial District.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 402 appears to be supportive, as the bill received no opposed votes during its final actions, suggesting a consensus among lawmakers regarding the necessity of maintaining clear financial boundaries between the two districts. Such unanimous support indicates a recognition of the importance of fiscal integrity and accountability in the management of judicial funds.

Contention

While there seems to be a level of agreement on the need for the bill, there could still be underlying concerns regarding how this change might affect judicial operations. The primary contention may revolve around the implications for personnel who may find their positions indirectly affected by these funding restrictions. As the legislation moves forward, monitoring the long-term effects on the administrative and operational capabilities of the courts will be essential.