Louisiana Senate Bill SB77

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/19
• Refer: 3/26/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 4/16/19
• Engrossed: 4/22/19
• Refer: 4/23/19
• Report Pass: 5/8/19
• Enrolled: 5/28/19
• Chaptered: 5/30/19
• Passed: 5/30/19

Caption

Provides relative to the judicial expense fund for the First and Second Parish Courts of Jefferson Parish. (gov sig)

Impact

The impact of SB 77 on state laws is significant as it reinforces the autonomy of local courts in managing their finances while also establishing accountability mechanisms. The bill mandates annual audits of the judicial expense funds and regulates how those funds can be used by the courts. By introducing a structured approach to handling these funds, it enhances the transparency of judicial financial activities, which is crucial for maintaining public trust in the legal system.

Summary

Senate Bill 77 proposes amendments to the judicial expense fund allocations specifically for the First and Second Parish Courts of Jefferson Parish. The legislation seeks to detail the procedures required for the administration, disbursement of funds, and auditing processes regarding these funds. This bill aims to ensure that every criminal case within the jurisdiction of these courts incurs an additional cost imposed on convicted defendants, which will be directed to support the operational costs of the courts themselves.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 77 appears to be favorable, as it passed in the House with 86 votes in favor and no opposition. This overwhelming support suggests that legislators recognize the need for proper financial management within local courts. However, it's important to acknowledge that although the bill received bipartisan approval, there may still be concerns regarding the implications of increasing costs for defendants and whether such measures could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Advocates for stricter judicial funding have expressed that it is essential for maintaining the integrity of the courts.

Contention

Notable points of contention within discussions surrounding SB 77 may include concerns about the added financial strain on defendants due to the imposed costs. While supporters argue that it is a necessary funding mechanism to support court operations, opponents may raise issues about fairness and access to justice for all individuals. Furthermore, the legislation highlights changes in how local court administrations can operate, potentially sparking discussions on judicial independence versus oversight from local government authorities.