Louisiana House Bill HB932

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/12/12
• Engrossed: 4/24/12
• Refer: 4/25/12
• Report Pass: 5/1/12
• Refer: 5/2/12
• Report Pass: 5/10/12
• Enrolled: 5/16/12
• Chaptered: 5/25/12
• Passed: 5/25/12

Caption

Provides with respect to financial security for survivors of certain law enforcement officers (EN INCREASE SG EX See Note)

Impact

The bill has significant implications for the Louisiana state laws regarding benefits administration for law enforcement officers' families. By broadening the criteria for eligibility, HB932 aims to ensure that more families receive the support they need in the unfortunate event of the officer's death. It establishes clearer guidelines for the benefits review process and enhances the operational effectiveness of the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen's Survivor Benefit Review Board, tasked with assessing claims.

Summary

House Bill 932 seeks to enhance financial security for the surviving spouses and children of certain law enforcement officers. Specifically, it allows these dependents to receive survivor benefits in scenarios where the officer dies while traveling to or from a public safety emergency or while on his way to work using a vehicle provided by their employing agency. This bill amends existing laws to ensure that benefits can be awarded to those who may not have previously qualified under the prevailing regulations at the time of the officer's death.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB932 appears to be positive, particularly among law enforcement advocacy groups and family members of officers. Supporters argue that the bill addresses vital gaps in the benefits system and shows a commitment to supporting those who risk their lives in public service. Lawmakers expressed strong support during discussions, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that these families are not left without vital assistance in their time of need.

Contention

While the discussions about HB932 were largely favorable, there could still be potential points of contention regarding the administrative burden of implementing the changes. Some stakeholders may raise concerns about the additional workload on the Board and whether it can effectively manage the increased responsibilities without additional resources. Moreover, scrutiny regarding the pre-existing conditions that may affect eligibility for benefits could also surface, calling for careful monitoring once the bill is enacted.