Louisiana House Bill HB170

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/19
• Refer: 3/26/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 5/1/19
• Engrossed: 5/14/19
• Refer: 5/15/19
• Report Pass: 5/20/19
• Enrolled: 6/3/19
• Chaptered: 6/20/19
• Passed: 6/20/19

Caption

Provides relative to financial security for surviving spouses and children of certain cadets (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The impact of HB 170 on state laws is significant as it expands the definition of eligible law enforcement personnel to include cadets undergoing training who perform police and wildlife enforcement duties. As law enforcement has been a high-priority area for legislators, this amendment manifests a proactive approach to securing financial benefits for families in case of line-of-duty incidents. By including cadets in this financial security framework, the bill strengthens the safety net for those potentially exposed to the inherent dangers of law enforcement work.

Summary

House Bill 170 is focused on enhancing financial security for the surviving spouses and children of law enforcement officers and cadets in Louisiana. The bill amends existing legislation to clarify that members of the Louisiana State Police and the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Enforcement personnel, as well as relevant cadets, are included within the provisions, thus ensuring they receive critical financial support when necessary. This change reflects a commitment to those serving in law enforcement roles, acknowledging the risks associated with their duties.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 170 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, with bipartisan support reflected in the voting records. The House Vote on HB 170 saw 92 members voting in favor with no opposition. This strong support suggests a recognition of the importance of safeguarding the families of those who serve, showcasing a shared commitment to law enforcement personnel's welfare across party lines.

Contention

While the bill has garnered significant support, points of contention could arise in discussions about funding such financial security measures, particularly in balancing the state budget or reallocating resources. However, as the bill passed unanimously, it indicates that concerns did not majorly impact the legislative process in this instance. Nonetheless, ongoing discussions about how to sustain these measures effectively will likely continue in future legislative sessions.