Louisiana Senate Bill SR172

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/31/12
• Passed: 6/1/12

Caption

Requests Select Committee on Women and Children to study the issues and state jurisdiction of certain child-on-child offenses occurring on federal military bases.

Impact

If acted upon, the resolution could lead to significant discussions on how state laws intersect with federal jurisdiction, particularly in addressing the problems of juvenile offenses on military bases. The findings of the committee could result in recommendations for legislative changes aimed at enhancing the legal framework governing such offenses. Through this investigation, the state may refine its approach to juvenile justice, specifically relating to children who are part of military communities.

Summary

Senate Resolution 172 urges the Select Committee on Women and Children to investigate issues related to child-on-child offenses occurring on federal military bases. The bill highlights the importance of addressing juvenile delinquency before it escalates, focusing on the need to understand the causes of crimes among children and taking preventive measures to mitigate such behaviors. The resolution recognizes the unique jurisdictional challenges posed by federal military installations when it comes to addressing crimes committed by minors.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SR172 appears to be generally supportive among legislators concerned with juvenile issues and child safety. Both proponents and stakeholders seem to view the resolution as a crucial step towards better understanding and prevention of child-related offenses on military bases. However, the sentiment could become more complex if the study reveals contentious findings that necessitate alterations to existing jurisdictional laws.

Contention

There are potential points of contention regarding state versus federal jurisdiction, especially with how laws should be applied to offenses committed on federal military bases. Discussions may emerge around the extent to which state agencies can act in cases involving military families and how to balance federal authority with state interests in juvenile justice. Additionally, if the committee uncovers significant issues, implementing changes may evoke debate over resource allocation and prioritization of juvenile crime prevention.