Connecticut Senate Bill SB00332

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/14
• Refer: 2/27/14
• Report Pass: 3/25/14
• Refer: 4/4/14
• Report Pass: 4/10/14
• Engrossed: 4/22/14
• Report Pass: 4/24/14
• Chaptered: 5/23/14
• Enrolled: 5/29/14
• Passed: 6/13/14

Caption

An Act Amending The Charter Of The Metropolitan District In Hartford County.

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to strengthen the operational autonomy of the Metropolitan District by clarifying its power to engage in contracts and supply services to various municipalities. This change allows for greater flexibility in addressing local water supply needs, potentially leading to improved infrastructure in the surrounding areas. Additionally, it explicitly states that any bonds or financial obligations issued by the district will not be considered as debts of the state, insulating the state's finances from the district's fiscal management.

Summary

SB00332, an Act Amending The Charter Of The Metropolitan District In Hartford County, primarily focuses on the management and operational frameworks for the Metropolitan District. It includes provisions allowing the district to supply water to non-member towns within a specified distance from Hartford and outlines the guidelines for issuing bonds or other financial obligations to support various projects and services within the district. The bill emphasizes the authority of the Metropolitan District to enter into agreements, set service charges, and ensure that infrastructure developments, particularly in water management and sewer services, are funded responsibly.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB00332 yielded a generally supportive sentiment, particularly from district representatives and local government officials who see this bill as a means to enhance service delivery and infrastructure support. However, there could be apprehensions about potential increases in costs for non-member municipalities and residents due to service charges, thus resulting in a mixed reaction from the broader public and local government entities. Some stakeholders may express concerns regarding the implications of non-member access to district resources.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the financial implications for non-member towns receiving water from the district. Critics argue that without competitive charges, the bill might inadvertently lead to an increased financial burden on these municipalities. Furthermore, the distribution of resources and ensuring equitable service provisions to both member and non-member municipalities raises concerns about the overall governance of the Metropolitan District, with calls for transparency in decision-making and fiscal management.