Louisiana Senate Bill SB84

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13
• Report Pass: 4/22/13
• Engrossed: 4/25/13
• Refer: 4/29/13
• Report Pass: 5/8/13
• Enrolled: 5/28/13
• Chaptered: 6/18/13
• Passed: 6/18/13

Caption

Authorizes a checkoff for a donation to Hunters for the Hungry when purchasing a fishing or hunting license. (6/1/14) (EN INCREASE SD RV See Note)

Impact

The creation of the Hunters for the Hungry Account within the Conservation Fund signifies a novel approach to fundraising for food assistance programs directly linked to activities like hunting and fishing. By directing funds collected via these donations to a dedicated account, SB84 ensures that a portion of the state’s hunting and fishing activities contributes to alleviating hunger. Funds in this account can only be used for specific purposes, including the operational costs associated with processing donated meats, thus enhancing accountability for the expenditure of these funds.

Summary

Senate Bill 84 establishes a framework that allows individuals purchasing hunting or fishing licenses in Louisiana to voluntarily donate to the Hunters for the Hungry initiative. This initiative aims to assist in the processing and distribution of meat to needy individuals through charitable organizations. This donation option is designed to be an automated and straightforward addition to the license purchasing process, highlighting the state's commitment to supporting hunger relief efforts in communities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB84 appears to be positive, with unanimous support indicated during the voting process. Senators recognized the public interest in combining recreational activities with community service, showcasing a sense of collective responsibility towards addressing hunger issues in the state. The measure reflects a growing trend in public policy that aligns social impact initiatives with community engagement opportunities.

Contention

Despite receiving unanimous support, potential contention may arise regarding the specific allocation of funds and the administrative oversight of the account. Concerns could center on how effectively Hunters for the Hungry can utilize these donations and whether the ten percent cap on administrative costs is sufficient to maintain operational efficiency. Additionally, monitoring the outcomes of this initiative and its actual impact on local hunger levels may become a key consideration for legislators and the public alike.