Louisiana Senate Bill SB210

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/13/15
• Report Pass: 4/27/15
• Engrossed: 4/30/15
• Refer: 5/4/15
• Report Pass: 5/20/15
• Enrolled: 6/8/15
• Chaptered: 6/29/15
• Passed: 6/29/15

Caption

Provides for the administration and uses of monies in the Hunters for the Hungry Account. (8/1/15)

Impact

If enacted, SB210 will directly influence the management of the Hunters for the Hungry program, allowing for up to 25% of the funds to be allocated towards administrative expenses. This contrasts with previous legislation that capped the amount at a lower percentage. Supporters argue that this modification will enable better management and outreach efforts, thus increasing the program's overall impact in alleviating hunger in communities. By clarifying the financial distribution, it aims to foster a more structured approach to resource allocation within the program.

Summary

Senate Bill 210 aims to amend existing legislation regarding the 'Hunters for the Hungry' initiative in Louisiana. This program allows hunters to donate wild game to nonprofit organizations for food distribution. The bill specifies the administration and use of the funds collected in the Hunters for the Hungry Account, emphasizing that a percentage of the funds should be dedicated to administrative costs while ensuring the majority is used for processing and distribution of donated meats. This change intends to enhance the operational efficiency of the program while ensuring that food resources reach those in need effectively.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB210 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents of the Hunters for the Hungry initiative. Advocates believe that allowing a higher percentage for administrative costs will lead to improved operational practices and greater public engagement with the program. However, there is a cautious optimism, with some stakeholders urging detailed oversight to ensure that the primary focus remains on meat processing and food distribution to those in need, rather than allowing excessive administrative expenditures.

Contention

The main points of contention regarding SB210 revolve around the balance between administrative costs and the funds allocated for food distribution. Critics may argue that increasing administrative expenditures could divert necessary resources away from processing and delivering food to individuals relying on the program. There are concerns that the bill could unintentionally reduce the effectiveness of the initiative if not monitored properly, highlighting the need for accountability in the use of funds from the Hunters for the Hungry Account.