Louisiana Senate Bill SB118

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13
• Report Pass: 4/15/13
• Engrossed: 4/23/13
• Refer: 4/24/13
• Report Pass: 5/8/13

Caption

Provides relative to the use, expenditure, or allocation of funds appropriated to public postsecondary education management boards. (gov sig)

Impact

One of the notable changes introduced in SB 118 is the allowance for management boards to redirect up to 5% of their allocated funds to address unforeseen issues during the budget process. This flexibility is designed to enable boards to respond effectively to emerging needs without requiring extensive legislative intervention. However, the bill also explicitly states that the legislature will not be obligated to fund the proposed outcomes-based funding formula, which originated from a task force. This clause has implications for future budgeting and funding availability in the state's higher education system.

Summary

Senate Bill 118 seeks to clarify and modify the powers and duties of postsecondary education management boards in Louisiana concerning the allocation and expenditure of appropriated funds. The bill stipulates that these boards have the authority to receive, spend, and transfer allocated funds, provided that their actions align with the broader funding formula adopted by the Board of Regents. By retaining current laws while adding specific provisions, the bill aims to ensure a consistent approach to fund management across educational institutions in the state.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB 118 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who perceive it as a necessary adjustment to enhance the operational effectiveness of management boards. Proponents argue that the bill empowers educational institutions by providing them with greater financial flexibility. Conversely, some legislators express concerns about the potential implications of the bill's provisions, particularly regarding the lack of a guarantee for outcomes-based funding, which could affect long-term financial stability for certain programs and institutions.

Contention

Debate during the legislative process highlighted divergent views on the role of state versus local control in managing educational resources. Critics of the bill worry that the lack of a funding obligation could lead to disparities in how different institutions are funded, particularly affecting those reliant on outcomes-based metrics. This contention reflects ongoing tensions in state education policy, where balancing budgetary constraints with the need for equitable access to quality education remains a crucial challenge.