Louisiana House Bill HB680

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/16/13
• Refer: 4/17/13

Caption

Reduces the rates of corporate income tax and repeals the corporation franchise tax

Impact

The proposed law would effectively change the landscape for corporate taxation in Louisiana, significantly lowering the tax burden for businesses, especially smaller corporations and those earning below the exempt threshold. With the elimination of the franchise tax, businesses may experience reduced compliance costs and administrative burdens associated with tax reporting. The implementation of this bill, set for January 1, 2014, signals a strategic move by the legislature to foster a more business-friendly environment in Louisiana, with the expectation of invigorating the local economy through enhanced corporate profitability.

Summary

House Bill 680 aims to reduce the corporate income tax burden by exempting the first $200,000 of Louisiana taxable income from taxation and repealing the corporation franchise tax altogether. This change represents a significant shift in the state's approach to corporate taxation, which has historically included a structured rate schedule that imposes varying tax rates based on income thresholds. The bill seeks to stimulate economic growth by allowing corporations to retain more of their income, which proponents argue will encourage investment and job creation within the state.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 680 appears to favor the business community, particularly among advocates of tax reform who believe that these changes will attract and retain corporate entities in Louisiana. However, there are concerns over the potential revenue loss for the state, as the repeal of the franchise tax could decrease funds available for public services. While supporters celebrate the anticipated growth in business and investment, critics worry about the long-term implications on state funding and the balance between economic incentives and fiscal responsibility.

Contention

Debate surrounding HB 680 is likely to center around the efficacy of tax reductions in promoting meaningful economic benefits versus the risk of diminishing state revenue. Some lawmakers and analysts may express concern that such fiscal policies could disproportionately benefit larger corporations at the expense of small businesses and essential public services. Additionally, critics may argue that repealing the franchise tax could lead to an imbalance in how public services are funded, thus sparking discussions about the need for a more equitable tax structure that addresses both business growth and community needs.