Alabama 2024 Regular Session

Alabama House Bill HB96

Introduced
2/6/24  
Introduced
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Report Pass
4/30/24  
Refer
2/29/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Report Pass
4/30/24  
Passed
5/17/24  
Enrolled
5/8/24  
Passed
5/17/24  

Caption

City of Lake View, to authorize municipal court to recall bench warrant for fee

Impact

The implementation of HB 96 will specifically modify the operations of the municipal court in Lake View by introducing a fee for warrant recalls, which will not exceed $100. This change is expected to relieve some pressure on the municipal court system by allowing defendants a more straightforward means to manage outstanding warrants, thereby potentially decreasing the volume of unpaid fines and improving compliance with local ordinances. The collected fees are to be allocated to the City of Lake View Corrections Fund, ensuring that the funds directly support local judicial functions.

Summary

House Bill 96 focuses on the municipal court system in the City of Lake View, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama. The bill grants municipal judges or magistrates the authority to recall failure to appear or compliance warrants in exchange for a fee set by the defendant. This initiative aims to provide a structured process for defendants to clear warrants while generating funds for the city's courts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 96 appears to be generally positive, particularly from supporters who view it as a practical solution to manage warrant recalls. The introduction of a fee is seen as a way to incentivize compliance with municipal ordinances while simultaneously providing a new revenue stream for the municipal court. Opposition, if any, may stem from concerns about the financial burden the fee places on low-income defendants, but no significant dissent is noted in the voting history.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding HB 96 is the degree of discretion afforded to municipal judges or magistrates in recalling warrants. Critics may argue that the subjective nature of this discretion could lead to inconsistencies in how defendants are treated based on the judges' personal views. However, the bill clearly states that recalling a warrant is at the sole discretion of the municipal judicial authority, emphasizing the need for a reasonable application of any financial requirements imposed on defendants.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AL HB275

Relating to the City of Northport in Tuscaloosa County; to provide for a warrant recall fee to allow a municipal judge or municipal magistrate for the City of Northport to recall, under certain conditions, a failure to appear warrant.

AL SB82

Criminal procedure; recall of warrants required in certain circumstances

AL HB332

Municipalities; warrant procedures, certain digital, electronic, or telephonic means of obtaining a warrant authorized

AL HB13

Relating to municipalities; to amend Section 11-45-9.1, Code of Alabama 1975, to provide that all municipalities may authorize a law enforcement officer to issue a summons and complaint in lieu of a custodial arrest for certain criminal offenses.

AL HB3925

Court costs; creating the Cost Administration Implementation Committee; warrants; establishing court costs compliance program; court costs; fees; effective date; emergency.

AL HB258

Authorizes the collection of bench warrant fees in the 27th Judicial District Court (EN +$67,200 LF RV See Note)

AL SB478

Authorizes the levy of a warrant recall fee in all courts in East Baton Rouge Parish to fund a misdemeanor jail. (8/1/14) (EN INCREASE LF RV See Note)

AL HB2259

Court financial obligations; warrants; cost hearings; ability to pay; effective date.

AL HB2259

Court financial obligations; warrants; cost hearings; ability to pay; effective date.

AL H3844

Bench warrants for bond violations

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.