Louisiana House Bill HB189

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Progressive Security Insurance Company as Subrogee of Quint Marceaux v. State of Louisiana, through the DOTD, the Parish of Iberia and the City of New Iberia"

Impact

The appropriation will directly impact state finances by allocating funds from the general fund, which could potentially influence other budgetary commitments within the state. It underscores the importance of handling legal judgments and the obligations that arise from lawsuits involving state entities, which may affect how future appropriations are viewed by lawmakers. The case illustrates the financial responsibilities that can arise from state actions or oversight, indicating a potential area for legislative focus on state liability and legal risk management.

Summary

House Bill 189 addresses the appropriation of $14,250 from the state general fund of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2014-2015. The funds are designated specifically for the payment of a consent judgment in a legal case involving Progressive Security Insurance Company as subrogee of Quint Marceaux against the State of Louisiana, the Department of Transportation and Development, the Parish of Iberia, and the City of New Iberia. This action reflects the state's commitment to addressing legal liabilities and ensuring settlements in judicial matters are resolved by allocating necessary funds.

Sentiment

Discussion around HB 189 tends to be neutral since it addresses a specific financial obligation resulting from a court decision rather than introducing new policies or creating controversial regulations. There may be minor contention regarding budget allocation priorities, but the bill's purpose—to ensure compliance with a legal judgment—generally receives support as it aligns with responsible governmental practices.

Contention

While HB 189 is unlikely to face significant opposition, any contention surrounding it would likely focus on the implications of funding judgments from the general fund. Concerns may arise about how such appropriations affect available funds for other state services or projects, emphasizing the need for transparency and responsible fiscal management. The bill serves as a reminder of the potential financial liabilities the state may incur through judicial processes.