Louisiana Senate Bill SB234

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 3/24/14
• Engrossed: 3/26/14
• Refer: 3/27/14
• Report Pass: 4/30/14
• Enrolled: 5/21/14
• Chaptered: 5/30/14
• Passed: 5/30/14

Caption

Provides for remission to Indigent Defender Fund of certain court costs in mayor's court of the Town of New Llano. (gov sig) (EN +$60,000 LF RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of SB234 is expected to generate an estimated additional revenue of approximately $60,000 for the state through court costs. This revenue will directly contribute to the state’s efforts to provide legal defense for individuals unable to afford such services. By ensuring that a portion of municipal ordinance penalty fees are earmarked for the Indigent Defender's Fund, the bill complements ongoing initiatives aimed at securing fair representation in the justice system, particularly for disadvantaged populations.

Summary

Senate Bill 234, introduced by Senator John Smith, amends existing Louisiana legislation relating to the mayor's court of the town of New Llano. This bill specifically focuses on court costs associated with municipal ordinance violations, allowing the mayor to impose additional costs not exceeding forty dollars for each offense. These additional fees are intended to help fund the Thirtieth Judicial District's Indigent Defender's Fund, with ten dollars from the additional costs being remitted to this fund for every violation. By enabling this financial mechanism, the bill aims to enhance support for legal aid services for indigent defendants.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB234 appears to be generally positive, with legislators recognizing the importance of supporting legal defenses for indigent defendants. The bill received overwhelming approval in the legislative voting process, signaling strong bipartisan support. The relatively low number of opposing votes (nays) reflects a consensus on the importance of providing financial assistance to the Indigent Defender's Fund, a vital resource in the legal system.

Contention

While there is generally favorable sentiment towards SB234, some concerns may arise regarding the implications of imposing additional court costs, particularly how they may affect low-income residents facing municipal violations. Critics may argue that even nominal increases in court fees could pose barriers to justice, leading to further financial strain on those already in precarious situations. Furthermore, there are discussions to be had about the allocation of the generated funds and ensuring that they are effectively utilized to support legal defense services without overburdening defendants.