Louisiana Senate Bill SB212

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 3/24/14
• Engrossed: 3/26/14
• Refer: 3/27/14
• Report Pass: 4/29/14
• Enrolled: 5/21/14
• Chaptered: 5/30/14
• Passed: 5/30/14

Caption

Allows the use of a firearm sound suppressor while hunting certain wild quadrupeds. (8/1/14)

Impact

The enactment of SB 212 directly affects state hunting regulations by permitting a method that could potentially make hunting quieter and less intrusive on wildlife and local communities. By allowing sound suppressors, the bill aligns Louisiana’s hunting laws with those of other states where such practices are already legal. This is anticipated to facilitate a more enjoyable experience for hunters while also addressing concerns about noise pollution, which has been a contentious issue in hunting debates.

Summary

Senate Bill 212 amends existing laws related to hunting in Louisiana, particularly focusing on the use of firearm sound suppressors. The bill allows individuals authorized to possess a sound suppressor, evidenced by a federal tax stamp, to use such devices while hunting game birds and wild quadrupeds. Additionally, it stipulates that individuals with certain hunting violations cannot use sound suppressors for a period of five years following their conviction. The bill seeks to regulate the conditions under which sound suppressors can be used in hunting activities, thus aiming to balance both hunting practices and wildlife conservation efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 212 appears to be generally supportive among the hunting community and individuals advocating for more lenient regulations regarding hunting equipment. Proponents argue that the bill enhances the hunting experience and promotes responsible hunting practices. However, there are concerns from wildlife conservation advocates who worry that it may lead to increased hunting pressure on some species and undermine conservation efforts if not managed properly.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around the potential impact of using sound suppressors on wildlife populations and the ethical considerations related to hunting. While supporters emphasize the benefits of improved hunter satisfaction and less disturbance to wildlife, opponents argue that allowing sound suppressors could encourage overhunting and complicate wildlife management efforts. The debate highlights a broader discussion about the balance between hunters' rights and wildlife conservation responsibilities in Louisiana.