Provides for a per diem for board members of the Washington Parish Gas Utility District No. 2. (gov sig) (EN +$1,500 LF EX See Note)
The introduction of SB 262 introduces a clear framework for compensating board members, which can enhance participation and accountability. By specifying that board members may only receive a per diem instead of a fixed salary, it offers a cost-control mechanism for the Gas Utility District and ensures that compensation aligns with actual service rendered. Additionally, it allows for reimbursement of legitimate expenses related to district duties, further supporting the board in fulfilling its responsibilities without significant financial burden.
Senate Bill 262 aims to establish a per diem payment structure for board members of the Washington Parish Gas Utility District No. 2. The legislation stipulates that while board members cannot receive a salary for their duties, they are eligible to receive compensation for meeting attendance and for days dedicated to district business, capped at a maximum of $100 per day. This provision is intended to provide an incentive for board service while keeping the compensation structure transparent and cost-effective for the district's operations.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 262 appears positive, as it provides a mechanism that can increase board member participation while maintaining fiscal responsibility. The bill garnered unanimous support during its voting process, revealing a consensus among legislators on the importance of ensuring that utility boards can attract committed members while managing public finances efficiently. The absence of dissenting votes indicates strong bipartisan agreement on the necessity and benefits of the bill.
While there was no significant opposition to SB 262, potential points of contention could arise regarding the adequacy of the per diem structure and the implications for board member responsibility. Stakeholders might argue about what constitutes 'proper expenses' or how additional duties should be compensated beyond the per diem framework. Discussions may also delve into the broader consequences for governance and accountability within public utility districts, particularly in terms of ensuring that board members remain focused on the interests of the community and efficient management of resources.