Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00651

Introduced
1/23/15  
Introduced
1/23/15  
Refer
1/23/15  
Refer
1/23/15  
Refer
4/8/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning A Temporary Hold For Certain Family Violence Arrestees.

Impact

The bill amends several sections of existing state statutes, particularly those concerning the conditions of release for individuals charged with family violence crimes. The proposed changes include classifying violations of these hold periods as criminal offenses, and exempting peace officers from civil liability for their actions taken during domestic violence arrests under specified circumstances. Consequently, this could impact law enforcement practices by encouraging the immediate assessment of risks to victims, thereby enhancing their protection during potentially dangerous situations.

Summary

SB00651, also known as 'An Act Concerning A Temporary Hold For Certain Family Violence Arrestees', primarily addresses the treatment of individuals arrested for domestic violence offenses. It introduces provisions that establish a temporary hold period for such arrestees, during which they may not be released immediately. This measure is intended to provide victims of domestic violence a crucial window of time to ensure their safety and possibly make necessary arrangements before the alleged perpetrator is released.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00651 appears supportive among advocates for victims of domestic violence, as it seeks to strengthen protective measures. Lawmakers and activists have typically expressed cautious optimism, citing the need for better safety measures for victims who may be at risk at the time of an arrest. However, criticisms also arise concerning the efficacy and implementation of this temporary hold, with some arguing that it may inadvertently complicate the legal proceedings for both victims and accused individuals.

Contention

A significant point of contention involves the concerns related to the balance of rights between alleged victims and the accused. Critics may worry that implementing a mandatory hold could lead to unintended consequences for the accused, particularly regarding their legal rights and due process. Additionally, there is debate about the practical efficacy of the bill when it comes to resource allocation for law enforcement agencies tasked with implementing these new procedures, as well as the ability to effectively monitor compliance with the new statutes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.

NJ S1911

Establishes "Internet Predator Investigation and Prosecution Fund" with $200 assessment on persons convicted of certain offenses.