Connecticut Senate Bill SB00851

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/15
• Refer: 1/30/15

Caption

An Act Concerning The Eligibility Of Children Enrolled In The Husky Plan.

Impact

The bill is expected to provide uninterrupted healthcare coverage for needy children residing with their families, addressing a critical need for health services among low- to moderate-income families. By implementing presumptive eligibility for children applying for Medicaid and enhancing the application process through a centralized servicer, the bill aims to streamline access for families seeking to enroll in the HUSKY Plan. It is designed to operationalize benefits more efficiently, potentially decreasing barriers for applicants and ensuring that eligible children receive care without unnecessary delays.

Summary

SB00851, titled 'An Act Concerning The Eligibility Of Children Enrolled In The HUSKY Plan,' aims to expand healthcare access for children by modifying eligibility criteria based on family income levels. Under the bill, children from families with incomes between 185% and 300% of the federal poverty level (FPL) can qualify for subsidized benefits, while families earning above 300% can access unsubsidized benefits through the HUSKY Plan, Part B. This is a significant update to existing state laws, as it seeks to broaden the coverage available to families in varying economic circumstances.

Conclusion

Overall, SB00851 represents a proactive step towards enhancing healthcare coverage for children in Connecticut, with a focus on equitable access and streamlined processes. The bill underscores the importance of ensuring that even families with modest incomes can secure necessary health benefits without facing complex bureaucratic hurdles.

Contention

However, there are notable points of contention around the proposed changes. Opponents may argue that broadening the eligibility could place additional financial burdens on the state's Medicaid program, raising concerns about sustainability and resource allocation. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the balance of access versus the quality of services provided—a common theme in the discussion of public healthcare provisions.