Michigan House Bill HB5190

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/24/23
• Refer: 10/24/23
• Report Pass: 6/12/24
• Engrossed: 6/20/24
• Refer: 6/25/24
• Report Pass: 11/13/24
• Refer: 11/13/24
• Report Pass: 12/10/24
• Enrolled: 12/12/24

Caption

Drains: other; definition of per diem and compensation for drainage boards; modify. Amends secs. 72, 384, 441, 464 & 515 of 1956 PA 40 (MCL 280.72 et seq.).

Impact

The bill seeks to enhance flood management by improving the framework for governance over drainage projects across Michigan. By refining the legislative language concerning the compensation of drainage board members and the operational aspects of drainage districts, HB5190 aims to streamline processes, making them more effective in managing issues related to flooding and environmental health. This legislative change is expected to lead to better coordination among local governments, drainage districts, and communities, with a clear focus on public welfare.

Summary

House Bill 5190 amends provisions of the 1956 Public Act 40, which relates to the establishment and management of drainage districts in Michigan. The bill primarily involves modifications to definitions and compensation for members of the drainage boards that oversee projects aimed at managing drainage and flood control. This includes improved organizational structures and financial provisions for handling operational costs, as well as clarifying the role of the board of determination that assesses the necessity and public benefit of drainage projects.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB5190 is favorable among local government officials, as many view the bill as a necessary step to modernize and improve the efficiency of drainage management in the state. However, there are concerns noted about increased expenses related to the compensation of board members, which some stakeholders fear may divert funds from essential flood control projects. Overall, the bill has been perceived as a practical approach to address Michigan's ongoing drainage challenges.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention arise regarding the potential financial implications for local municipalities that may face increased costs associated with the new provisions for drainage board member compensation. Critics argue that, while the intention to streamline operations is commendable, the bill could place an additional burden on local budgets, particularly in smaller communities with limited resources. This aspect of the bill has led to discussions around balancing efficient governance with financial sustainability for local entities.