Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB606

Introduced
3/31/14  
Refer
4/1/14  
Refer
4/1/14  
Report Pass
4/15/14  
Report Pass
4/15/14  
Engrossed
4/23/14  
Engrossed
4/23/14  
Refer
4/24/14  
Refer
4/24/14  
Report Pass
4/30/14  
Report Pass
4/30/14  
Enrolled
5/26/14  
Enrolled
5/26/14  
Chaptered
6/12/14  
Chaptered
6/12/14  
Passed
6/12/14  

Caption

Provides for the use of electronic signatures by judges and justices. (8/1/14) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The passage of SB 606 is expected to have a transformative impact on court operations in Louisiana. By authorizing electronic signatures for court orders and judgments, the bill enhances the capability of the legal system to adapt to technological advancements. This legislative change allows various courts to establish specific rules regarding the application of electronic signatures, ensuring both authenticity and compliance with legal standards. Consequently, SB 606 aims to foster a more efficient workflow within the state’s judicial framework.

Summary

Senate Bill 606 introduces significant amendments to the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, facilitating the use of electronic signatures by judges and justices in executing court orders and documents. The bill's primary goal is to modernize court practices by allowing judicial officials to utilize electronic signatures to streamline processes associated with filing and managing court documents. This move is anticipated to improve efficiency in the judicial system, promote accessibility, and reduce the reliance on physical paper documents.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 606 appears to be largely supportive among stakeholders due to its prospective benefits in enhancing judicial efficiency. Advocates highlight the necessity of adapting to electronic technologies, especially in light of the growing digital landscape. However, there may be concerns regarding the security and verification processes associated with electronic signatures, prompting discussions on the adequacy of safeguards in place.

Contention

While SB 606 has garnered overall support, notable points of contention may arise around the potential challenges related to adopting new technology within the judiciary. Questions regarding the integration of electronic signing processes and the reliability of these signatures in legal proceedings may be scrutinized. Additionally, stakeholders involved in legal processes must be adequately educated to navigate the new electronic systems, avoiding possible disruptions or misunderstandings in court operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB305

Provides relative to electronic signatures by judges

LA HB63

Provides relative to electronic signatures by judges

LA HB46

Requires judges to sign and print their names on all judgments (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

LA SB373

Provides relative to motions for summary judgments. (8/1/14) (EG SEE FISC NOTE LF RV)

LA HB229

Provides relative to electronic filings (OR SEE FISC NOTE LF EX See Note)

LA SB532

Provides for the creation of the Veterans Court Program. (8/1/14) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

LA HB380

Provides relative to electronic filings (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

LA HB2493

Electronic signatures; judges; justices

LA SB75

Provides for electronic filing and record retention. (8/1/24)

LA SB586

Provides relative to adoptions and prohibits the re-homing of a child. (8/1/14) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

CA AB774

Civil actions: enforcement of judgments.

KY HB801

AN ACT relating to Canadian money judgments.

AZ HB2297

Judgments; liens; homestead exemption

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB905

Money judgments of other jurisdictions.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

VA HB1234

Judgments; limitations on enforcement, extensions and renewals.