Directs state agencies to consider certain provider impact issues and to issue certain provider impact statements prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules
Impact
The introduction of HCR170 is expected to enhance accountability among state agencies and provide legislators with crucial information necessary for informed decision-making. By ensuring that service providers' operational realities are considered before rule enactments, this resolution seeks to create a more balanced approach to policy development. It recognizes the complexities involved in delivering services and underscores the need for state agencies to communicate effectively with providers about impending changes that might impact their operations and ability to serve clients.
Summary
HCR170 is a concurrent resolution aimed at mandating state agencies to consider the impact of proposed rule changes on service providers before they adopt, amend, or repeal any rules. This measure emphasizes the importance of transparency in the policy development process, ensuring that the legislature is adequately informed about the potential fiscal consequences of policy alterations affecting the state budget and service providers. The resolution requires a 'provider impact statement' to be prepared, detailing how such changes could affect staffing requirements, costs, and service delivery capabilities.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment surrounding HCR170 appears positive among lawmakers who value transparency and accountability. Legislators who supported the resolution likely view it as a step forward in ensuring that the voices of service providers are heard in the rule-making process. However, there may be some degree of apprehension among state agencies regarding the additional administrative burden of preparing provider impact statements, which could slow down the rule adoption process and complicate agency operations.
Contention
While there may not be overt contention surrounding HCR170, discussions among state officials and service providers might highlight concerns over the feasibility of implementation. Some may argue that the added requirement for provider impact statements could impede timely rule changes necessary for adapting to emerging challenges. Thus, balancing the need for thorough impact assessments with the efficiency of administrative processes remains a critical consideration for the resolution's proponents and opposing viewpoints.
Requires the consideration of certain provider impact issues and issuance of a provider impact statement prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules by a state agency
Requires the consideration of certain poverty impact issues and issuance of a poverty impact statement prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules by a state agency. (1/1/13) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)