Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05495

Introduced
2/29/16  
Refer
2/29/16  
Report Pass
3/21/16  
Refer
4/1/16  
Refer
4/1/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Enhanced Penalties For Threatening A Judge.

Impact

The bill directly impacts existing state law by amending sections related to threatening crimes in the Connecticut penal code. By elevating the severity of threats made against judges, the bill seeks to provide greater protections for judicial officials, thereby promoting the integrity and independence of the judiciary. The amendments also aim to deter individuals from engaging in threatening behavior, thus contributing to overall public safety within judicial environments.

Summary

House Bill 05495 aims to enhance penalties for individuals who threaten judges and magistrates during the execution of their official duties. The legislation specifically redefines the crime of threatening in the first and second degree, emphasizing the severity of threats made against judges and reinforcing their roles as key figures in the judiciary system. As part of the changes, the bill proposes to classify threatening a judge as a class C felony under certain conditions, acknowledging the unique dangers judges face in their line of work.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding HB 05495 appears supportive, especially among legal professionals and advocacy groups focused on strengthening the judiciary. Supporters argue that enhancing penalties for threatening judges is a necessary step to uphold the rule of law and protect those who serve in the judiciary. However, there are concerns regarding potential overreach and the implications of classifying certain threats as felonies, particularly in how those definitions might be interpreted in practice.

Contention

One notable point of contention during discussions around the bill was the implications for free speech and the potential for misuse of the enhanced penalties. Critics worry that broad interpretations of threats could lead to over-criminalization of speech versus intent. As the legislature considers amendments, stakeholders are keenly aware of balancing the need for judicial protection against possible infringements on individual rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05422

An Act Concerning Hate And Bias Crimes.

CT HB05403

An Act Concerning Military Protection Orders And Other Interpersonal Violence Protections.

CT HB05161

An Act Concerning Child Sexual Abuse Material.

CT HB05500

An Act Concerning Revisions To Various Laws Concerning Ignition Interlock Devices, The Department Of Correction, Judicial Retirement Salaries And Criminal Law And Criminal Procedure.

CT SB00212

An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes.

CT HB05262

An Act Concerning Child Sexual Abuse.

CT SB00390

An Act Concerning Penalties For Certain Election Crimes.

CT SB00426

An Act Concerning Court Operations And Administrative Proceedings.

CT HB05505

An Act Concerning Self-defense, Defense Of A Third Person And Assisting In Or Effecting An Arrest As Affirmative Defenses.

CT HB05436

An Act Concerning Educator Certification, Teachers, Paraeducators And Mandated Reporter Requirements.

Similar Bills

ME LD402

An Act to Move the Natural Areas Program from the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and to Amend the Law Governing Administration of the Bureau of Resource Management Within the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

CA AB237

Crimes: threats.

CA AB355

Crimes: extortion.

CA AB1872

Crimes: extortion.

HI SB3161

Relating To The Conservation Of Threatened Species.

HI HB2472

Relating To The Conservation Of Threatened Species.

NJ A4424

Concerns justified use of force and deadly force.

NJ S3099

Concerns justified use of force and deadly force.