Connecticut Senate Bill SR00004

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/16
• Refer: 2/10/16
• Refer: 2/26/16
• Report Pass: 3/3/16

Caption

Resolution Proposing Approval Of A Collective Bargaining Agreement Between The University Of Connecticut Board Of Trustees And The University Of Connecticut Professional Employees Association (ucpea).

Impact

The resolution's approval is significant as it ensures that the terms agreed upon between the University and the UCPEA are formally recognized and enacted. This collective bargaining agreement plays a vital role in setting the wages, benefits, and working conditions for professional employees within the university system. Such agreements often impact how the university operates, including budget allocations for employee salaries and resources dedicated to staff welfare.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 4 (SR00004) proposes the approval of a collective bargaining agreement between the University of Connecticut Board of Trustees and the University of Connecticut Professional Employees Association (UCPEA). This agreement, effective from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2021, aims to establish the terms and conditions of employment for the professional employees at the University. The resolution is a formal acknowledgment by the Senate that seeks to uphold the negotiated terms agreed upon in the collective bargaining process.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards SR00004 is largely supportive among university stakeholders and members of the Professional Employees Association. The recognition and ratification of collective bargaining agreements are seen as fundamental to maintaining fair labor practices and improving job satisfaction among professional staff. However, there may be dissent among those who perceive increased labor costs as a potential burden on the university's financial resources.

Contention

While the resolution itself may not present significant contention, the underlying issues can be contentious, particularly concerning budgetary constraints and the negotiation process. Critics could argue that such agreements may lead to higher operational costs for universities. Additionally, the negotiation process may be scrutinized for its transparency and the extent to which it reflects the needs of the employees versus the university administration. Balancing financial responsibility with equitable treatment of employees remains a contentious issue within higher education institutions.