Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB23

Introduced
3/4/15  
Introduced
3/4/15  
Refer
3/4/15  
Refer
3/4/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
5/5/15  
Report Pass
5/5/15  
Engrossed
5/11/15  
Engrossed
5/11/15  
Refer
5/12/15  
Refer
5/12/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Enrolled
6/8/15  
Enrolled
6/8/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  
Chaptered
6/29/15  

Caption

Provides relative to payment of group insurance premiums for retired sheriffs and deputy sheriffs of the West Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office. (8/1/15)

Impact

This legislation directly impacts the retirement benefits of law enforcement personnel in West Baton Rouge Parish, ensuring that those who have dedicated at least thirty years of their service to the Sheriff's Office can receive comprehensive medical insurance coverage after retirement. By addressing the financial aspects of healthcare for these retirees, the bill aims to enhance the quality of life for those who have served the community, effectively acknowledging their service and sacrifices.

Summary

Senate Bill 23 amends R.S. 13:5554(G)(3) to enhance the payment conditions for group insurance premium costs specifically for retired sheriffs and deputy sheriffs of the West Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office. The bill dictates that 100% of the premium costs for various types of group insurance, including health and life insurance, will be covered from the sheriff's general fund for eligible retired personnel, contingent on meeting specific service requirements in the Sheriff's Pension and Relief Fund.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 23 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as indicated by its unanimous passage with a vote of 95 yeas and no nays during the final approval in June 2015. Stakeholders likely view the bill as a necessary support mechanism for retired law enforcement personnel, which can improve their wellbeing in retirement, reflecting a broader commitment to public safety and recognition of service.

Contention

Although the bill was passed unanimously, potential contention can arise regarding the funding source for these benefits, especially from those concerned about the fiscal responsibilities on the sheriff's general fund. Critiques could include worries about the sustainability of such funding methods in times of budget constraints, and how it might impact other operational budgets within law enforcement agencies. Additionally, there may be discussions on whether similar benefits should extend to other law enforcement agencies or public service sectors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.