Louisiana Senate Bill SB26

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/15
• Refer: 3/6/15
• Refer: 4/13/15
• Report Pass: 4/20/15
• Engrossed: 4/27/15
• Refer: 4/28/15
• Report Pass: 5/19/15
• Enrolled: 6/3/15
• Chaptered: 6/23/15
• Passed: 6/23/15

Caption

Provides for a per diem for members of the Board of Commissioners of the West Calcasieu Port. (8/1/15) (EN +$6,000 LF EX See Note)

Impact

The amendment to R.S. 34:2102(B) will have implications on how the West Calcasieu Port compensates its commissioners, creating a formalized structure for per diem payments that was perhaps not as clearly defined before. By standardizing the maximum reimbursement amount, the bill could help maintain fiscal responsibility and consistency in how board members are compensated for their time. This will not only formally outline the limits to prevent excessive spending but may also serve to attract qualified individuals willing to serve on the commission by providing clear and reasonable compensation.

Summary

Senate Bill 26 aims to amend Louisiana's existing laws regarding the compensation for members of the Board of Commissioners of the West Calcasieu Port. Specifically, the bill provides for a maximum per diem payment for members attending board meetings. Under the proposed legislation, members can receive up to one hundred dollars per meeting for regular and special meetings, capped at two meetings per month, with a potential total payout of two hundred dollars for regular meetings within this timeframe. Additionally, this new regulation would ensure clarity around reimbursement for board members’ attendance.

Sentiment

Discussions around SB26 seem to reflect positive sentiment among legislators, as the bill passed with a significant majority in the Senate, receiving 37 votes in favor and only 1 against. The sentiment from proponents indicates that establishing a per diem is a step towards greater accountability and professionalism within public boards, ensuring that members are fairly compensated for their attendance and contributions. Concerns were likely minimal since the financial implications of the bill appear manageable and there is no indication of significant opposition.

Contention

While there do not appear to be substantial points of contention regarding SB26, there may be underlying discussions concerning the overall budget of the West Calcasieu Port and how per diem payments could affect its financial standing. Some critics might argue that any additional compensation could strain limited budget resources, particularly if the meetings become more frequent or if the per diem is perceived as excessive. However, this contention seems secondary to the overall legislative intent of formalizing compensation standards for board members.