Requires a motor vehicle repairman to disclose to customers that parts used in an auto body repair may not be new, original equipment manufacturer parts. (8/1/15)
Impact
The introduction of SB 77 will enhance transparency in the auto repair industry, giving consumers crucial information regarding the parts being used in vehicle repairs. This is significant given that the use of non-OEM parts can affect vehicle warranties. Consequently, customers will be better equipped to make informed decisions regarding their repairs. By standardizing the consumer auto body repair disclosure, SB 77 aims to foster better communication between repair shops and customers, potentially improving customer satisfaction and trust in repair services.
Summary
Senate Bill 77 requires auto body repairers to inform customers that some parts used in repairs might not be original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts. The bill mandates that before any work begins on a vehicle, repair workers must provide a standardized disclosure form to the customer. This form must outline the possibility of using non-new or non-OEM parts, which can include remanufactured or recycled components. It aims to ensure that customers have a full understanding of the nature of the repairs and the components that may be used in their vehicles.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SB 77 appears to be positive, with stakeholders emphasizing the importance of consumer rights and transparency in repairs. Proponents of the bill argue that it fortifies consumer protection by ensuring customers are aware of the types of parts that might be used on their vehicles. However, there may be concerns in the industry regarding the cost and logistics of implementing the new disclosure procedures, reflecting a balance of viewpoints on its practical implications.
Contention
Despite the general support, some contention may arise around the enforcement of disclosure and the penalties for violations. The bill stipulates that repairers who fail to comply with these disclosure requirements could face fines up to $1,000. This raises questions about how effectively the law can be enforced and if the penalties are adequate to ensure compliance. Additionally, the potential impact on repair costs, as repairers may need to adjust their processes to adhere to the new regulations, is a point of discussion among industry stakeholders.
Requiring manufacturers of digital electronic equipment to make available to owners and independent repair providers, on fair and reasonable terms, documentation, parts and tools used to diagnose, maintain and repair digital electronic equipment; and imposing a penalty.
Requiring manufacturers of digital electronic equipment to make available to owners and independent repair providers, on fair and reasonable terms, documentation, parts and tools used to diagnose, maintain and repair digital electronic equipment; and imposing a penalty.
Requiring manufacturers of digital electronic equipment to make available to owners and independent repair providers, on fair and reasonable terms, documentation, parts and tools used to diagnose, maintain and repair digital electronic equipment; and imposing a penalty.
Vehicles: agricultural equipment; original equipment manufacturers of electronics-enabled agricultural equipment to provide certain parts, tools, and documentation to owners and independent repair providers; require. Creates new act.
Requiring manufacturers of digital electronic equipment to make available to owners and independent repair providers, on fair and reasonable terms, documentation, parts and tools used to diagnose, maintain and repair digital electronic equipment; and imposing a penalty.
Providing for transparency and disclosure of information collected by smart technology devices; establishing the Smart Technology Disclosure Fund; and providing for powers and duties of the Office of Attorney General.