Louisiana Senate Bill SB201

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Constitutional amendment to provide for ballot initiatives. (2/3-CA13s1(A)) (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

If passed, SB 201 would fundamentally change the landscape of legislative power in Louisiana by enhancing direct democracy. The amendment is expected to allow for a greater voice for the electorate in shaping laws and constitutional changes without solely relying on elected representatives. This shift could lead to more grassroots-driven legislative proposals, reflecting the will of the people in a manner that is currently not possible under the existing constitution. It represents a significant expansion of public engagement in the legislative process.

Summary

Senate Bill 201, proposed by Senator Gallot, seeks to amend Article III, Section 1 of the Louisiana Constitution to allow citizens to propose statutes and constitutional amendments via direct initiatives. This proposed constitutional change aims to provide the electorate with more direct power in the legislative process, enabling them to bypass traditional legislative pathways by presenting initiatives through a petition process. This amendment would empower citizens to submit initiatives either in person or electronically, contributing to a more participatory form of governance in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 201 appears to be mixed. Proponents advocate for the bill as a means to empower citizens, enhance democratic participation, and address issues that may be overlooked by the legislature. However, opponents express concerns regarding the potential for misuse of the initiative process, fearing that it could lead to hasty or poorly designed laws. The debate hinges on the tension between empowering the electorate and maintaining a structured legislative process conducted by elected officials.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the feasibility and implications of allowing direct initiatives. Critics argue that such a process may lead to a flood of initiatives that could overwhelm the legislative apparatus and complicate governance. They worry that the initiative mechanism might be exploited for narrow interests rather than the general public good. Supporters counter that a robust initiative process would necessitate careful structuring, with adequate safeguards to ensure that initiatives reflect the interests of a broad segment of the population.