Connecticut Senate Bill SR00008

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/6/17
• Refer: 1/11/17
• Report Pass: 1/25/17
• Report Pass: 2/1/17

Caption

Resolution Approving The Settlement Agreement In Juan F., Et Al. V. Dannel Malloy, Et Al.

Impact

By approving the settlement agreement outlined in SR00008, the state of Connecticut acknowledges its financial obligations stemming from this legal action. This decision impacts the state's budgetary allocations, ensuring that funds are directed towards fulfilling commitments that may enhance educational resources or services involved in the underlying dispute. As such, this resolution marks a significant action within the legislative framework concerning the handling of legal settlements and their implications for state finance.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 8, introduced by Senator Looney, addresses the settlement agreement for the case of Juan F., et al. v. Dannel Malloy, et al., which originates from a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. This resolution specifically approves provisions of the settlement that require an expenditure of over two million five hundred thousand dollars from the state's General Fund budget. The case involves significant implications for state-level accountability and financial management pertaining to legal settlements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR00008 appears to be generally supportive among those who prioritize adherence to legal agreements and accountability. The approval of financial resolutions like this one is often characterized by collaborative efforts in the legislature; however, concerns may arise regarding the strain it places on the state budget. Overall, the resolution reflects legislative recognition of the necessity to resolve legal matters in a manner that is financially responsible.

Contention

While there is broad agreement on the importance of fulfilling the terms of the settlement, discussions may arise regarding the best allocation of state funds and the implications of such expenditures on other critical services. Notably, some legislators might express concerns about budget constraints, the prioritization of funding, and the potential need for additional resources to meet state obligations. The resolution illustrates the tension between necessary financial commitments and the overarching need to maintain a balanced state budget.