Louisiana House Bill HB790

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/21/15
• Refer: 4/22/15

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgments in the matter of "Ademon M. Rideaux and Gloria P. Rideaux v. Gilchrist Construction Company, L.L.C., and State of Louisiana, through the DOTD" c/w "Brian Brooks v. Gilchrist Construction Company, L.L.C., and State of Louisiana, through the DOTD"

Impact

The passage of HB 790 will directly affect state laws concerning appropriations and the handling of financial judgments against the government. Appropriating funds for such judgments establishes a precedent for future cases, signaling the state’s obligation to honor court decisions. This bill specifically allocates the funds required by court orders, thereby ensuring that the state complies with legal judgments and maintains a responsible fiscal approach towards settlements, assisting in the avoidance of potential future liabilities related to accruing interest on unpaid judgments.

Summary

House Bill 790 focuses on the appropriation of funds from the state general fund of Louisiana to pay consent judgments related to two legal cases: 'Ademon M. Rideaux and Gloria P. Rideaux v. Gilchrist Construction Company, L.L.C., and State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development' and 'Brian Brooks v. Gilchrist Construction Company, L.L.C., and State of Louisiana, through the DOTD'. The bill appropriates a total of $1,375,000 for these payments, which reflects the outcomes of legal disputes involving the state and these plaintiffs. This financial decision underscores the state's responsibility to address the outcomes of court rulings concerning state operations and contractors.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 790 appears to be generally supportive among members of the legislature, as it addresses the practical necessity of settling existing legal obligations. However, there may be concerns regarding the overall financial impact on the state's budget, especially given the substantial sum allocated for these judgments. Legislators may express support for fulfilling legal responsibilities while also debating the budgetary implications of such appropriations, reflecting a balance between accountability and financial governance.

Contention

While this bill primarily serves to satisfy legal judgments, it raises some contention regarding public funds and their allocation. Critics might argue that a large sum like $1,375,000 could be better allocated towards pressing state needs such as infrastructure or education. Meanwhile, supporters would highlight the importance of adhering to judicial rulings and ensuring individuals receive compensation as mandated by the courts. The discussions surrounding HB 790 illustrate the ongoing challenges of managing state finances and upholding the rule of law amidst fiscal constraints.