Louisiana House Bill HB29

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/16
• Refer: 1/22/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Appropriates funds for the payment of judgment in the matter of "Curtis J. Bonin v. State of Louisiana, DOTD"

Impact

The enactment of HB 29 will directly impact the state's budget, as it involves a specific allocation of funds from the General Fund. This appropriation is necessary for compliance with the court's ruling, highlighting the state's responsibility to uphold judicial outcomes. As with many appropriations, it underscores the ongoing financial obligations that the government must manage, particularly concerning legal settlements that stem from its operations or actions taken by state departments.

Summary

House Bill 29, introduced by Representative Nancy Landry, addresses the appropriation of funds from Louisiana's General Fund for the payment of a consent judgment in the case titled 'Curtis J. Bonin v. State of Louisiana, DOTD'. Specifically, the bill seeks to allocate the amount of $24,500 for the fiscal year 2016-2017, which is earmarked to settle the legal liabilities associated with this judgment. This bill represents a procedural legislation aimed at ensuring the state can fulfill its financial obligations arising from legal decisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears largely procedural, with few points of contention reported in discussions. Given that HB 29 pertains to fulfilling a court judgment rather than introducing new legislation or regulatory changes, the discussions may have been more focused on financial accountability and administrative efficiency than on contentious policy debates.

Contention

There are minimal noted points of contention regarding HB 29, as it primarily deals with fulfilling a legal judgment rather than passing new legislation with broad implications. The nature of the bill being straightforward, focused on appropriation, indicates more administrative support rather than the potential for significant opposition. However, it does reflect the complexities of state budget management and the importance of ensuring appropriations are handled correctly to avoid future legal repercussions.