Louisiana Senate Bill SB30

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/16
• Refer: 2/25/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/29/16
• Engrossed: 3/31/16
• Refer: 4/4/16
• Report Pass: 5/4/16
• Enrolled: 5/19/16
• Chaptered: 5/27/16
• Passed: 5/27/16

Caption

Authorizes the exchange of land between the Department of Agriculture and Forestry and the Cooper Cemetery Association in Beauregard Parish. (8/1/16)

Impact

The enactment of SB 30 is expected to have a direct impact on property management and land rights within Beauregard Parish. By facilitating this land exchange, the Department of Agriculture can ensure that the land is used for purposes that serve the community properly. The bill highlights the role of state agencies in managing land resources effectively while also balancing the interests of local organizations such as the Cooper Cemetery Association.

Summary

Senate Bill 30, sponsored by Senator John Smith, authorizes the exchange of a specified parcel of land between the Department of Agriculture and Forestry and the Cooper Cemetery Association located in Beauregard Parish. This bill amends previous legislation to officially permit the land transfer, detailing the measurements and legal descriptions of the property involved. Such exchanges are crucial for resolving land use and ownership issues while maintaining transparency and legality in government property transactions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 30 is generally positive, as it received unanimous support during the Senate vote. This indicates a collective recognition of the bill's importance in enhancing land administration and promoting cooperative efforts between governmental bodies and community organizations. The absence of dissent suggests that there are no significant concerns or controversies attached to this measure.

Contention

While no significant points of contention were reported during the discussions or voting of SB 30, it is essential to note that land exchange legislation can often be met with scrutiny if stakeholders perceive potential adverse effects on community resources or heritage sites. However, the detailed nature of the property's description and the clear authorization granted to the Department of Agriculture seem to mitigate such concerns in this instance.