Louisiana Senate Bill SB63

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/22/16
• Engrossed: 3/29/16
• Refer: 3/30/16
• Report Pass: 4/21/16
• Enrolled: 5/3/16
• Chaptered: 5/9/16
• Passed: 5/9/16

Caption

Removes the Chennault Aviation and Military Museum from the jurisdiction of the Department of State.(gov sig) (EN DECREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

By enacting SB 63, the implications for state laws are notable, as this bill eliminates specific statutory provisions that provided a framework for the operational governance of the Chennault Aviation and Military Museum. As a result, the museum would no longer be subject to the administrative oversight typically exercised by state departments, potentially allowing for more localized administration. This could lead to varying degrees of operational independence and local adaptation for the museum's activities and management.

Summary

Senate Bill 63 seeks to amend Louisiana statutes by removing the Chennault Aviation and Military Museum from the jurisdiction of the Department of State. This legislative change effectively repeals all statutory provisions relevant to the museum, thereby transferring its oversight away from state control. The bill indicates a shift toward decentralizing responsibilities regarding the museum, reflecting a possible push for greater local governance and management of such entities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 63 appears to be positive among lawmakers, as evidenced by the unanimous vote in favor of the bill during its passage. The complete absence of opposition votes may suggest that legislators view the bill as a straightforward improvement or correction in the management of state resources, particularly concerning heritage and military museums. The positive reception also reflects a broader willingness to adjust state governance structures to better suit local needs and contexts.

Contention

While SB 63 passed without opposition, the removal of state oversight could raise questions about accountability and standards for the Chennault Aviation and Military Museum moving forward. The key contention may arise in the form of discussions regarding who will assume the operational responsibilities that the state once held, and how this change might affect the museum's funding, programming, and alignment with broader state heritage initiatives. The complete deregulation may also spark debate over the quality of services provided without state oversight.