Louisiana Senate Bill SB139

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/16
• Refer: 3/2/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/22/16
• Engrossed: 3/29/16
• Refer: 3/30/16
• Report Pass: 4/21/16
• Enrolled: 5/3/16
• Chaptered: 5/9/16
• Passed: 5/9/16

Caption

Removes the Schepis Museum from the jurisdiction of the Department of State. (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

Impact

The repeal of Chapter 5-S of Title 25 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes removes all statutory requirements pertaining to the Schepis Museum, which could lead to changes in its operation and management. Since the museum will no longer be under the Department of State's oversight, it may have more freedom in establishing its governance and operational framework. However, this lack of state oversight could raise concerns about maintaining standards, accountability, and funding for the museum's operations.

Summary

Senate Bill 139 aims to repeal the statutory provisions related to the Schepis Museum, effectively removing it from the jurisdiction of the Department of State. This legislative action signifies a significant change in the management and regulatory oversight of the museum, which had previously been governed under specific state laws. By abolishing the relevant sections of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, the bill seeks to streamline operations surrounding the museum, though it is not immediately clear how its future will be structured post-repeal.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB139 appears to be largely positive among legislators given the unanimous voting outcome (93 yeas and 0 nays during the house vote). This level of support suggests that the bill's supporters view the repeal as a beneficial step toward more efficient governance of the museum. However, the absence of public commentary on the bill indicates that there may not have been significant opposition or debate regarding its implications, allowing for its swift passage through the legislature.

Contention

While there seems to be broad agreement on the potential benefits of SB139, there could be underlying concerns regarding the museum's governance post-repeal. Without the statutory framework that previously guided its operation, stakeholders may question how the museum will be funded and whether it will maintain its relevance and adherence to educational or cultural standards. Legislators will need to ensure that the museum does not suffer from a lack of direction or oversight in the absence of the Department of State's jurisdiction.