Louisiana Senate Bill SB69

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Constitutional amendment to provide for disqualification from holding an elective office. (2/3 - CA13s1(A))

Impact

The impact of SB 69 on Louisiana state law is significant as it aims to reaffirm and strengthen the framework governing the eligibility of convicted felons in public office contexts. By officially stating the fifteen-year disqualification period, the bill attempts to eliminate confusion around the previously held provisions. Furthermore, it emphasizes the role of gubernatorial pardons in restoring the right to seek office, potentially altering the landscape for many individuals affected by felony convictions who wish to re-enter the political sphere post-incarceration.

Summary

Senate Bill 69 is a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at clarifying and modifying the current provisions regarding the disqualification of individuals with felony convictions from seeking or holding public office in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill mandates that convicted felons who have completed their sentence are prohibited from running for or holding elective office for a period of fifteen years following the completion of their sentence. This constitutional change is designed to restore the rights of these individuals more definitively and addresses inconsistencies arising from earlier amendments that were found null and void in a court ruling.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SB 69 appears to be mixed among legislators and citizens. Supporters argue that the bill promotes fairness, allowing those who have served their time a chance to reintegrate into society and contribute positively by participating in local governance. Meanwhile, opponents express concerns that easing restrictions for convicted felons might lead to a dilution of the integrity of elected positions. This division reflects broader national conversations about criminal justice reform and rehabilitation versus public safety and trust in governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 69 include the length of the disqualification period and the circumstances under which a felon can regain eligibility to run for office. Critics argue that a fifteen-year waiting period may still disproportionately impact certain communities and serve as a barrier to political engagement for those who have paid their debt to society. Additionally, the discussions touch on the complicated balance between allowing rehabilitation and maintaining public trust in elected officials, indicating a need for further dialogue on the implications of such legislative changes.