Louisiana House Bill HB316

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/16
• Refer: 3/2/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Provides with respect to limitations on the rights of certain convicted felons to possess a firearm

Impact

The bill would reaffirm and reinforce existing laws concerning the possession of firearms by felons, particularly those convicted of violent crimes. By removing the possibility for these individuals to regain their firearm rights after a ten-year period without new convictions, the legislation may potentially reduce risks associated with gun ownership and ensure that those who have committed serious offenses remain restricted from firearms. This is expected to impact public safety positively, although it may also lead to conversations about the balance between rehabilitation and civil rights.

Summary

House Bill 316 focuses on the limitations placed on the rights of certain convicted felons to possess firearms in Louisiana. The bill proposes amendments to existing laws, specifically clarifying that individuals convicted of crimes of violence will remain prohibited from possessing firearms or carrying concealed weapons without an explicit gubernatorial pardon, effectively excluding these offenders from the ten-year 'cleansing period' that allows some felons to restore their rights. This change aims to tighten restrictions on gun ownership for a specific subset of felons deemed potentially more dangerous due to the nature of their crimes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 316 appears to lean towards support among those concerned with public safety and gun violence prevention. Proponents argue that maintaining strict gun control on felons convicted of violent crimes is necessary to protect the community. However, there remains contention about the implications for civil rights and the ability for individuals to rehabilitate and reintegrate into society. Critics of the bill may view it as overly punitive and a barrier to the rehabilitation of ex-offenders.

Contention

While supporters argue that the bill will enhance safety and reduce the likelihood of firearm-related incidents by individuals with histories of violence, opponents are likely to raise concerns about fairness and the potential for perpetuating systemic issues within the criminal justice system. The bill's requirement for a gubernatorial pardon may also lead to questions about the accessibility of the pardoning process and whether it is an equitable solution for those wishing to regain their rights.