Provides for the re-creation of the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism
The impact of HB651 on state laws is notable, as it effectively supersedes existing sunset provisions that would have led to the department’s closure. By re-creating the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism, the bill affirms the importance of promoting and maintaining Louisiana's cultural and recreational resources. This act not only preserves current operations but also allows for the potential growth and development of programs enhancing tourism and culture within the state, addressing fiscal concerns related to the funding of these initiatives.
HB651 aims to re-create the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism of Louisiana, which was at risk of termination under the state's sunset law. The bill establishes a new termination date of July 1, 2021, extending the department's operations for an additional four years beyond the original cessation date of July 1, 2016. The legislation is significant as it continues the authority of this department and the statutory entities associated with it, ensuring that programs related to culture, recreation, and tourism are maintained at the state level.
General sentiment around HB651 appears to be supportive, as lawmakers recognized the value of the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism for state identity and economic development. The bill received unanimous support during voting, indicating broad agreement among legislators about the necessity of maintaining this department. This also reflects a commitment to cultural heritage and tourism as vital to Louisiana’s economic landscape.
While the bill passed without dissent, there may be underlying tensions regarding funding and resource allocation. Critics often express concerns about the effectiveness and efficiency of state agencies, particularly those reliant on tourism and culture, as they can be viewed as expendable in tighter budgetary contexts. The re-creation under the sunset law, while fortifying the department temporarily, raises questions about long-term state priorities and how continually re-creating departments will address both cultural needs and financial sustainability.