Connecticut House Bill HB07060

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/17
• Refer: 2/15/17
• Report Pass: 3/7/17
• Refer: 3/17/17
• Report Pass: 3/23/17
• Refer: 4/19/17
• Report Pass: 4/25/17
• Refer: 4/27/17
• Engrossed: 5/16/17
• Report Pass: 5/18/17
• Chaptered: 6/20/17
• Enrolled: 6/26/17
• Passed: 7/10/17

Caption

An Act Prohibiting The Disclosure Of Identifying Information Of Department Of Housing Program Participants.

Impact

The introduction of HB 7060 would have far-reaching implications for state laws governing the confidentiality of program participant information. By sanctioning the unauthorized use and disclosure of such sensitive data, the bill aims to create a protective framework that aligns with privacy rights. This could set a precedent for similar measures in other state agencies, reinforcing the notion that personal information related to assistance programs should remain confidential and secure from public scrutiny.

Summary

House Bill 7060, also known as the Act Prohibiting The Disclosure Of Identifying Information Of Department Of Housing Program Participants, seeks to establish strict confidentiality measures for individuals receiving assistance from the Department of Housing. The bill explicitly prohibits the solicitation, disclosure, or use of any list or information concerning program participants, protecting their identities from being publicly available. This measure is aimed at ensuring that individuals seeking housing assistance can do so without fear of exposure or stigma attached to their participation in government programs.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around the bill has been positive, with many legislators recognizing the importance of privacy and data protection for vulnerable populations. Supporters argue that this legislation affirms the state's commitment to safeguarding individual rights and promoting a supportive environment for those in need of housing assistance. Nevertheless, there is also a recognition of the need for a balance between public accountability and the protection of personal information, which could lead to ongoing discussions regarding the bill's requirements for data management.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its intent to protect individual privacy, concerns have been raised about its implications for data transparency in public programs. Critics argue that restricting access to information could hinder oversight and accountability measures necessary to ensure effective program administration and prevent misuse of funds. This delicate balance between ensuring participant confidentiality and maintaining public trust in governmental processes will likely remain a point of contention as the bill progresses through legislative discussions.